Vaginal birth after cesarean has different risks compared to repeat cesarean sections

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that vaginal birth after cesarean has different risks compared to repeat cesarean sections?

Yes. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and repeat cesarean sections present distinct risk profiles, including differing likelihoods of surgical complications, blood transfusions, and uterine rupture.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 4 Aug 2026

The analysis

The claim is specific, empirical, and contestable, passing Step 0. Retrieved papers such as [0], [1], and [2] provide empirical comparisons of the risks associated with vaginal birth after cesarean versus repeat cesarean sections, consistently showing differing risk profiles (such as uterine rupture for TOLAC/VBAC versus surgical trauma and placentation issues for repeat cesareans). There are no refuting papers; thus, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

Evidence for · 3

Trial of Labor after Cesarean (TOLAC) for Vaginal Birth after Previous Cesarean Section (VBAC) Versus Repeat Cesarean Section; A Review

2016

Get citation

Rezai, S., Labine, M., Gottimukkala, S., Karp, S., Sainvil, L., Isidore, G., Cass, & Henderson, r. E. (2016). Trial of Labor after Cesarean (TOLAC) for Vaginal Birth after Previous Cesarean Section (VBAC) Versus Repeat Cesarean Section; A Review. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.15406/OGIJ.2016.04.00135

See more details

More for · 2

Blood Transfusion Following Intended Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Section in Women With a Prior Primary Cesarean: A Population‐based Record Linkage Study

2019

Get citation

Pont, S., Austin, K., Ibiebele, I., Torvaldsen, S., Patterson, J., & Ford, J. (2019). Blood Transfusion Following Intended Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Section in Women With a Prior Primary Cesarean: A Population‐based Record Linkage Study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000603680.30791.46

Is it safe for women with a history of two cesarean deliveries to undergo a vaginal delivery attempt in comparison to patient with a history of one cesarean delivery?

2025

Get citation

AE, H., D, B., SC, H., E, D., JT, B., J, B., N, Z., F, L., & L, J. (2025). Is it safe for women with a history of two cesarean deliveries to undergo a vaginal delivery attempt in comparison to patient with a history of one cesarean delivery?. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330216

Related receipts

Is it true that previous cesarean sections impose added risks during VBAC births? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that children born by cesarean section have a higher risk of ADHD? PARTIAL LEAN related question, same topic
Is it true that cesarean section delivery leads to later infertility in women? PARTIAL LEAN related question, same topic

What does the evidence say?

Receipt History

first checked04 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8304 Aug 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work