Source? prove it says who? that's just your opinion no cap? I read it somewhere fake news [citation needed] link? why should I believe you? citation or it's cap source: vibes do your own research

peer reviewed? big if true where'd you read that? sounds fake you got a reference for that? trust me bro pics or it didn't happen who funded that? everyone knows that an AI told me press X to doubt I saw a study once my uncle said so

SUPPORTED

Taking notes by hand improves recall more than typing.

Front. Psychol. · 2024

REFUTED

Goldfish have a three-second memory.

J. Fish Biology · 2006

REFUTED

We only use ten percent of our brains.

Behav. Brain Sci. · 2005

SUPPORTED

Naps under thirty minutes improve alertness.

IJERPH · 2021

trust me, bro.

(but here's the receipt)

Paste any claim and get:

Real citations
A verdict
A public receipt you can share

Full fact checking, finally.

The Trust Feed SUPPORTED · Fact-checking organizations cannot keep pace with the volume of claims published onlineSUPPORTED · Rhodium has atomic number 45.REFUTED · Goldfish have a memory span of only three secondsREFUTED · Henry Ford stated that if he had asked customers what they wanted they would have said faster horsesREFUTED · The Great Wall of China is visible from space with the naked eyeREFUTED · Bulls get angry when they see the color red.SUPPORTED · Fact-checking organizations cannot keep pace with the volume of claims published onlineSUPPORTED · Rhodium has atomic number 45.REFUTED · Goldfish have a memory span of only three secondsREFUTED · Henry Ford stated that if he had asked customers what they wanted they would have said faster horsesREFUTED · The Great Wall of China is visible from space with the naked eyeREFUTED · Bulls get angry when they see the color red.

Make a claim? We'll make the receipt.

The problem: the internet runs on unproven claims.

Most of what you read is asserted, not sourced. AI made it faster to assert and no easier to check.

We checked our own claim

trustmebro.to/is-it-true/fact-checkers-cannot-keep-pace

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Fact-checking organizations cannot keep pace with the volume of claims published online

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that fact-checking organizations cannot keep pace with the volume of claims published online?

Yes. Evidence consistently shows that traditional, manual fact-checking organizations struggle and ultimately fail to keep pace with the sheer volume of claims published online, motivating the development of automated computational tools.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 28 Jul 2026

The analysis

The claim that fact-checking organizations cannot keep pace with the volume of online claims is widely supported in the literature, notably by older foundational work (e.g., Ciampaglia et al., 2015) as well as recent automated fact-checking studies (e.g., Hu et al., 2026; Chen et al., 2025) emphasizing the need for AI solutions due to human scalability limits. There are no papers refuting this widely acknowledged constraint.

Evidence for · 3

Performance of Large Language Models in the Cognitive Analysis of Misinformation: Evaluation Study.

2026

Human moderators face significant challenges regarding scalability when attempting to keep pace with the volume of online misinformation.

Get citation

DN, W., C, M., L, Z., C, P., & R, M. (2026). Performance of Large Language Models in the Cognitive Analysis of Misinformation: Evaluation Study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2196/72524

See more details

More for · 2

Development and validation of a multi-agent AI pipeline for automated credibility assessment of tobacco misinformation: a proof-of-concept study.

2025

Traditional manual fact-checking approaches are resource-intensive and unable to match the pace at which misinformation spreads online.

Get citation

S, E., J, M., S, B., & A, G. (2025). Development and validation of a multi-agent AI pipeline for automated credibility assessment of tobacco misinformation: a proof-of-concept study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1659861

Computational Fact Checking from Knowledge Networks

2015

Traditional fact-checking by expert journalists cannot keep up with the enormous volume of information generated online.

Get citation

Ciampaglia, G. L., Shiralkar, P., Rocha, L. M., Bollen, J., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Computational Fact Checking from Knowledge Networks. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128193

What does the evidence say?

Receipt History

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

permanent link →

Trust, the solution: two shapes.

One for the claim, one for the argument. Both point at recorded evidence.

A citation

A real paper: authors, year, DOI, in your format.

Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.

For source citations

A receipt

The claim, the verdict, both sides, on a shareable link.

For arguments

Inspect the sources.

A citation identifies a source; it does not establish that the source supports your claim. Check the source text, context and the receipt's recorded limitations. 22,053 receipts minted.

Everything between "source?" and "oh!"

Citations & receiptsCheck a claim and inspect the sources returned for it. Coverage is limited; a citation is not guaranteed for every claim.

Read the recorded outcomeInspect the verdict, evidence and limitations, including partial or unavailable outcomes.

Inspect the excerptsCheck quotations against the original source and read their context.

Retraction informationScans look up recorded DOIs in OpenAlex. They do not cover every source or guarantee an overnight update.

Highlight a claimOn supported pages, select text and use right-click or your configured shortcut. Bro and Pro can enable the optional selection button after accepting the disclosure and browser page access. Selecting text alone sends no claim.

Challenge a receiptSign in to submit a counter-source for manual review. Submission does not automatically re-run the engine.

See how the pipeline actually works

The extension lives where the arguments live.

The popup checks a claim. The Receipts tab keeps your history and searches the Trust Wiki. Add it from the Chrome Web Store. See how it works →

A sentence highlighted in a Wikipedia article with the Trust Me Bro card open underneath it: a STRONG verdict, the paper it rests on, a verified quote and a copyable citation. — **Earlier interface preview: in-page results.** Deliberate right-click and shortcut checks use supported pages. Bro and Pro can enable the optional selection button after accepting the disclosure and browser page access. Selecting text alone sends no claim.

Other tools do some things. Only trust me bro does it all.

Feature	trust me.	GPTZero	Consensus	Zotero	Grammarly	Jenni
Retrieves potential evidence sources	✓	·	✓	·	·	·
Judges whether it supports the claim	✓	·	·	·	·	·
Shows the evidence against, too	✓	·	·	·	·	·
Verifies quotes word for word	✓	·	·	·	·	·
Catches retracted papers	✓	·	·	·	·	·
Formats the citation	✓	·	✓	✓	·	✓
Works on the page you are reading	✓	✓	·	·	✓	·
Hands you a shareable receipt	✓	·	·	·	·	·
Anyone can challenge the verdict	✓	·	·	·	·	·
Price	$9.99/mo	$15/mo	$8.99/mo	free	$12/mo	$20/mo

Competitor prices are their advertised individual plans, checked July 2026. We are not affiliated with any of them.

Taste it

Free

5 checks a month, receipts and share links included.

Before you ask: fair questions.

What's the difference between a citation and a receipt?

A citation identifies a source using available bibliographic details. A receipt presents a recorded claim outcome, evidence and limitations. It does not guarantee a settled answer, a confidence score or support from every cited source.

Who is this actually for?

Someone mid-argument who knows they read it somewhere and needs the source in ten seconds. Paste a claim in the popup or use a deliberate page selection.

What does it work on?

Paste a claim in the extension popup, or deliberately check a selection on supported pages using right-click or your configured shortcut. Direct editing in Google Docs and other rich-text editors is not universally supported; use paste.

Can I use this inside my own product?

The Trust API accepts one claim per request and returns recorded result fields and available sources. Confidence may be unavailable, and checks may produce public receipts. Do not submit confidential or personal information. Read the API page for authentication, limits, current prices and response handling.

Is it free?

Five checks a month are free, receipts and share links included, no card. Bro is $9.99 a month for 400 checks and 100 API calls; Pro is $29.99 for 1,000 of each. Annual is twelve months for the price of ten.

All 22 questions, answered

Don't take our word for it. That's the whole point.

Coming soon

Claim (demo unavailable)

The homepage demo is not available. Browse existing receipts below.

Already on the record: 10 percent of our brains · the marshmallow test · power posing · the Great Wall from space

Create an account Add to Chrome or pull a random receipt →

Supported pagesChrome extensionPaste a claim APA · MLA · BibTeX · RISPublic receipt links

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

trust me, bro.

The problem: the internet runs on unproven claims.

Fact-checking organizations cannot keep pace with the volume of claims published online

Is it true that fact-checking organizations cannot keep pace with the volume of claims published online?

What does the evidence say?

Trust, the solution: two shapes.

Everything between "source?" and "oh!"

The receipts. Here's what that actually looks like:

The Great Wall of China is visible from space with the naked eye

Is it true that the Great Wall of China is visible from space with the naked eye?

Rhodium has atomic number 45.

Is it true that Rhodium has atomic number 45?

Goldfish have a memory span of only three seconds

Is it true that Goldfish have a memory span of only three seconds?

Henry Ford stated that if he had asked customers what they wanted they would have said faster horses

Is it true that Henry Ford stated that if he had asked customers what they wanted they would have said faster horses?

What does the evidence say?

The extension lives where the arguments live.

Other tools do some things. Only trust me bro does it all.

Before you ask: fair questions.

Don't take our word for it. That's the whole point.