✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Knowledge differs epistemically from mere belief.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Is it true that knowledge differs epistemically from mere belief?
Yes. Philosophical consensus and reference literature indicate that knowledge differs epistemically from mere belief, notably requiring justification or adding value that belief alone lacks.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
How claims like this are judged
Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.
Evidence for · 3
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Knowledge. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge
See more details
More for · 2
It notes there are types of knowledge that are not types of belief.
Get citation
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Belief. (n.d.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/
It notes knowledge adds something that mere true belief lacks.
Get citation
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: The Ethics of Belief. (n.d.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-belief/
Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work