trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Cigarette smoking causes lung cancer
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
6 sources for · 0 against

Extensive scientific literature consistently demonstrates that cigarette smoking is a primary cause of lung cancer, operating through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, DNA damage, and epigenetic alterations.

Evidence for · 6
2024 · cited by 90
This review highlights that cigarette smoke triggers oxidative DNA damage and chronic inflammation that combine to promote lung carcinogenesis.
See more details
The analysis

All relevant retrieved papers that address the claim support the well-established consensus that cigarette smoking causes lung cancer, detailing various cellular, genetic, and molecular mechanisms involved. There are no papers refuting this relationship.

More for · 5
2011 · cited by 81
This overview confirms that direct genotoxicity and epigenetic alterations induced by cigarette smoke are major causes of carcinogenesis.
2014 · cited by 28
This experimental study demonstrates that exposure of mice to cigarette smoke induces systemic clastogenic damage and promotes lung tumors.
2014 · cited by 21
This paper notes that cigarette smoking is the primary cause of lung cancer and examines molecular abnormalities induced by cigarette smoke condensate.
2020 · cited by 10
This study discusses how contemporary concepts of lung carcinogenesis involve chemical carcinogens from cigarette smoke acting alone or with asbestos.
2025 · cited by 4
This investigation details mechanisms by which cigarette smoke condensate induces pulmonary carcinogenesis through lncRNA circuits and epigenetic changes.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8704 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt