trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

White noise impairs studying, reading, memory recall, and learning

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
6 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Multiple empirical studies and meta-analyses demonstrate that background noise and acoustic distraction impair cognitive tasks such as reading comprehension, verbal learning, memory recall, and language processing.

The analysis

The claim is specific and falsifiable, passing Step 0. The retrieved literature robustly supports the premise that environmental noise, background speech, and poor signal-to-noise ratios disrupt verbal learning, reading comprehension, memory recall, and working memory tasks (papers 0, 1, 2, 3, 9, 10). There are no refuting papers provided in the retrieved set.

Evidence for · 6
Recorded source metadata

R. McCreery, P. Stelmachowicz. The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828576e2

Paper 0 demonstrates that background noise impairs working memory recall and increases verbal processing time.

See more details
More for · 5
Recorded source metadata

Bernice Wright, E. Peters, U. Ettinger, E. Kuipers, V. Kumari. Effects of environmental noise on cognitive (dys)functions in schizophrenia: A pilot within-subjects experimental study. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.03.017

Paper 1 finds that environmental noise significantly disrupts delayed verbal recall and working memory performance.

Recorded source metadata

S. Hygge, A. Kjellberg, Anatole Nöstl. Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01390

Paper 2 shows that low signal-to-noise ratios impair free recall and verbal learning performance.

Recorded source metadata

Jessica Massonnié, D. Mareschal, N. Kirkham. Individual Differences in Dealing With Classroom Noise Disturbances. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12322

Paper 3 reviews evidence that background speech and noise interfere with reading comprehension, text recall, and working memory.

Recorded source metadata

Shen Y. Distractions in digital reading: a meta-analysis of attentional interference effects.. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1671214

Paper 9's meta-analysis indicates that attentional interference, such as background music and noise, has a negative effect on reading comprehension.

Recorded source metadata

Socher M, Ström I, Andin J, Elwér Å, Wengelin Å, Ingo E. Language Comprehension in Background Noise - Effects of Noise Type and Task Modality.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.478

Paper 10 reports that background noise significantly impairs language comprehension tasks.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8501 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt