trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Yes. Psychological research recognizes various forms of intelligence—such as emotional intelligence and creative or divergent thinking—that extend beyond or diverge from standard IQ test measures.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Evidence for · 4
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Intelligence quotient. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient

See more details
More for · 3
2015
Identifies types of intelligence that go beyond standard IQ measures.
Get citation
Gerrig, R. J., Zimbardo, P. G., Campbell, A. J., Cumming, S. R., & Wilkes, F. J. (2015). Book: Psychology and Life. Pearson Higher Education AU. http://books.google.com/books?id=1CLiBAAAQBAJ&dq=Research+identifies+forms+of+intelligence+that+diverge+from+standard+IQ+measures&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api

2008
Notes that the standard IQ approach does not capture everything embodied by the concept of giftedness.
Get citation
Harwood, R., Miller, S. A., & Vasta, R. (2008). Book: Child Psychology. John Wiley & Sons. http://books.google.com/books?id=IJOhEAAAQBAJ&dq=Research+identifies+forms+of+intelligence+that+diverge+from+standard+IQ+measures&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api

2012
Examines emotional intelligence measurement approaches that diverge from standard cognitive ability tests.
Get citation
Libbrecht, N. & Lievens, F. (2012). Validity evidence for the situational judgment test paradigm in emotional intelligence measurement.. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.682063

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Receipt History
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8706 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work