trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Motivation and efficiency are inversely correlated

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 6 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

The claim that motivation and efficiency are inversely correlated is refuted by psychological and neuroscientific research, which instead demonstrates an inverted-U-shaped relationship (the Yerkes-Dodson law) where performance peaks at moderate levels of arousal and motivation.

The analysis

The claim asserts a simple inverse correlation (monotonic decrease) between motivation (or arousal) and efficiency (performance). However, the literature robustly supports the Yerkes-Dodson law and related findings, which dictate an inverted-U-shaped relationship: performance increases with moderate increases in arousal or motivation and only decreases at excessive levels. None of the retrieved papers support a linear inverse correlation, and several explicitly discuss or confirm the inverted-U curve. Therefore, the claim is refuted.

Evidence against · 6
Recorded source metadata

Yaniv Hanoch, Oliver Vitouch. When less is more. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304044918

Discusses how the classical Yerkes-Dodson framework links arousal and performance via an inverted-U shape rather than a simple inverse correlation.

See more details
More against · 5
Recorded source metadata

P. Watters, F. Martin, Z. Schreter. Caffeine and Cognitive Performance: The Nonlinear Yerkes–Dodson Law. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1077(199705/06)12:3<249::AID-HUP865>3.0.CO;2-J

Supports the inverted-U relationship between physiological arousal and cognitive performance.

Recorded source metadata

S. Khazaei, Md. Rafiul Amin, R. T. Faghih. Decoding a Neurofeedback-Modulated Cognitive Arousal State to Investigate Performance Regulation by the Yerkes-Dodson Law. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629764

Demonstrates an inverted-U relationship between cognitive arousal states and performance.

Recorded source metadata

L. Beerendonk, Jorge F. Mejías, S. Nuiten, J. W. de Gee, J. Zantvoord, Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort, S. van Gaal. Adaptive arousal regulation: Pharmacologically shifting the peak of the Yerkes–Dodson curve by catecholaminergic enhancement of arousal. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2419733122

Confirms that performance typically peaks at moderate arousal levels rather than continuously decreasing as arousal increases.

Recorded source metadata

Lopez Blanco C, Tyler WJ. The vagus nerve: a cornerstone for mental health and performance optimization in recreation and elite sports.. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1639866

Notes that performance models are rooted in the Yerkes-Dodson law where moderate states optimize performance.

Recorded source metadata

Wei Yi, Xin Li, Wangxiao Chen, Linlin Yan, Fei Xin, Tony W. Buchanan, Jianhui Wu. An inverted U-shaped relationship between chronic stress and the motivation to expend effort for reward. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2025.100724

Finds an inverted-U-shaped relationship between stress/arousal states and motivation indicators rather than a simple inverse correlation.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1301 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt