trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

A thief attempted to conceal his identity from security cameras using lemon juice

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Evidence shows that bank robber McArthur Wheeler smeared lemon juice on his face under the belief that it would hide his identity from security cameras.

How claims like this are judged

Judged against fact-checker rulings and reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the fact-checking record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 2
Recorded source metadata

en.wikipedia.org: 1995 Greater Pittsburgh bank robberies. en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1995_Greater_Pittsburgh_bank_robberies

The text states McArthur Wheeler covered his face in lemon juice believing it would make him invisible to cameras.

See more details
More for · 1
Recorded source metadata

skeptics.stackexchange.com: Did a thief think he could conceal his identity from security cameras by .... skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/35801/did-a-thief-think-he-could-conceal-his-identity-from-security-cameras-by-putting

The question and background confirm McArthur Wheeler covered his face with lemon juice believing it would prevent recording.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7531 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt