Aggregation in economics produces different outcomes than analyzing a representative agent.
Economic aggregation with heterogeneous agents frequently produces different macroeconomic outcomes and policy implications than analyzing a single representative agent.
The retrieved literature consistently supports the claim that accounting for agent heterogeneity leads to different macroeconomic outcomes, emergent properties, and distinct policy recommendations compared to representative agent models.
WOUTER J. DEN HAAN. SOLVING DYNAMIC MODELS WITH AGGREGATE SHOCKS AND HETEROGENEOUS AGENTS. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100597003040
Demonstrates that modeling economies with heterogeneous agents and aggregate shocks requires specific algorithms because individual decisions and distributions influence macro outcomes.
See more details
Jan Schulz-Gebhard. Essays on Aggregation With Heterogeneous and Interacting Agents. https://doi.org/10.20378/irb-59389
Argues that when micro agents interact and are heterogeneous, macro behavior exhibits emergent properties that are not reducible to isolated actions.
Alaïs Martin-Baillon. Essays on macroeconomic policies in heterogeneous agent models. https://doi.org/10.70675/667dbe38z7bb2z4255z98a3z6589d8ea2135
Shows that incorporating agent heterogeneity changes our understanding of macroeconomic policies and leads to different recommendations compared to representative agent models.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt