Valid and reliable self-report measures of computer literacy exist

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Valid and reliable self-report measures assessing computer and information literacy are documented in empirical literature.

The analysis

The retrieved papers include specific studies validating self-report instruments related to computer and information literacy, directly supporting the claim that such valid measures exist.

Evidence for · 2

Development and validation of an Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale for medical students

Recorded source metadata

Ann De Meulemeester, Heidi Buysse, Renaat Peleman. Development and validation of an Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale for medical students. 2018. https://doi.org/10.11645/12.1.2300

Paper [0] develops and validates the Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale for Medicine, demonstrating high internal consistency and validity.

Source citation format

See more details

More for · 1

Validation of the Business Computer Self-Efficacy Scale: Assessment of the Computer Literacy of Incoming Business Students

Recorded source metadata

Paul Stephens. Validation of the Business Computer Self-Efficacy Scale: Assessment of the Computer Literacy of Incoming Business Students. 2006. https://doi.org/10.2190/cfhj-mjxn-8lwa-p3qc

Paper [1] provides validity and reliability evidence for the Business Computer Self-Efficacy Scale as a measure of computer literacy.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8201 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt