trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Images of eyes promote prosocial behavior

the verdict
CONTESTED
the evidence cuts both ways
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

While early studies suggested that images of eyes promote prosocial behavior by triggering a sense of being watched, recent replications and broader reviews have yielded mixed findings, leading the scientific community to contest the robustness and generalizability of the effect.

The analysis

The claim is an empirical psychological hypothesis ('the watching eyes effect'). While some papers (like meta-analytic work on antisocial behavior [0] or studies on gaze cues [5]) support the idea that eye cues influence behavior, several prominent studies and replication attempts [1, 4, 6] have failed to replicate the effect or found that control images (like flowers) work just as well. Because of these mixed findings, failed replications, and boundary condition debates, the balance verdict is CONTESTED.

Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

K. Dear, Kevin Dutton, E. Fox. Do ‘watching eyes’ influence antisocial behavior? A systematic review & meta-analysis. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EVOLHUMBEHAV.2019.01.006

A meta-analysis of 15 experiments indicates that watching eyes reduce antisocial behavior.

Evidence against · 3
Recorded source metadata

N. Raihani, R. Bshary. A positive effect of flowers rather than eye images in a large-scale, cross-cultural dictator game. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0758

A large-scale cross-cultural dictator game found that flower images rather than eye images promoted cooperation.

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Rogers RD, Bayliss AP, Szepietowska A, Dale L, Reeder L, Pizzamiglio G, Czarna K, Wakeley J, Cowen PJ, Tipper SP. I want to help you, but I am not sure why: gaze-cuing induces altruistic giving.. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033677

Implicit learning about reliable gaze cues can prompt altruistic giving in economic games.

Recorded source metadata

P. V. van Lange, Z. Manesi. Reputation Reminders: When do Eye Cues Promote Prosocial Behavior?. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2023.4

Reviews indicate that the watching eyes effect can promote prosocial behavior under specific conditions such as reduced anonymity and low costs.

More against · 2
Recorded source metadata

Yuta Kawamura, T. Kusumi. The norm-dependent effect of watching eyes on donation. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EVOLHUMBEHAV.2017.05.003

A replication study failed to find that watching eyes promoted generosity regardless of existing social norms.

Recorded source metadata

Rotella A, Sparks AM, Mishra S, Barclay P. No effect of 'watching eyes': An attempted replication and extension investigating individual differences.. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255531

A pre-registered study failed to replicate the watching eyes effect and observation effect in a dictator game.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → CONTESTED · 3001 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt