trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Public transport is less fuel-efficient per passenger-mile than private cars.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Evidence indicates that public transport is generally more fuel-efficient per passenger-mile than private cars, directly contradicting the claim.

The analysis

Judged against statistical and reference sources.

Evidence against · 2
Recorded source metadata

Wikipedia: Public transport. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_transport

Reference article covering this claim directly

See more details
More against · 1
Recorded source metadata

sciencedirect.com: Carbon-efficient density thresholds for public transit vs. .... sciencedirect.com. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1361920925000513

It discusses carbon efficiency thresholds for public transit versus private vehicles, implying transit can be more efficient.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1031 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt