There is a positive link between popularity and happiness among school-aged children

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Multiple studies demonstrate that school-aged children with higher peer status, acceptance, and popularity tend to report greater happiness and subjective well-being.

The analysis

The claim is specific and empirically testable, passing Step 0. Retrieved papers such as [3] and [8] directly examine the relationship between peer status or popularity and happiness/subjective well-being among school-aged children, finding positive associations. There are no papers contradicting this relationship, making the verdict 'SUPPORTED'.

Evidence for · 2

Social Withdrawal: Self-Efficacy, Happiness, and Popularity in Introverted and Extroverted Adolescents

Recorded source metadata

M. R. Rankin Young, M. T. Bradley. Social Withdrawal: Self-Efficacy, Happiness, and Popularity in Introverted and Extroverted Adolescents. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177/082957359801400103

Paper [3] demonstrates that adolescents reporting lower popularity also view themselves as significantly less happy.

Source citation format

See more details

More for · 1

The ties that bind: exploring the impact of sociometric position, friendships, and bullying on early adolescents' subjective well-being.

Recorded source metadata

Hoffmann T, Diósi K, Basa B, Vargha A, Kollár KN. The ties that bind: exploring the impact of sociometric position, friendships, and bullying on early adolescents' subjective well-being.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/218453

Paper [8] confirms that subjective well-being in early adolescents is significantly associated with sociometric position and positive peer relationships.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8401 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt