trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Elementary particles can have extremely long lifespans approaching stability

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Standard particle physics models and Grand Unified Theories support the premise that certain elementary particles, such as the proton, can possess extraordinarily long lifespans, pushing the limits of stability.

The analysis

The claim addresses the extremely long lifespans or stability of elementary particles (such as nucleons/protons). Papers [5] and [6] discuss proton decay suppression and baryon number violation limits, which imply that elementary particles can have lifetimes vastly exceeding the age of the universe, rendering them effectively stable or near-stable. The retrieved papers on this topic support this established physics concept.

Evidence for · 2
Recorded source metadata

A. Azatov. Flavor Physics in SO(10) GUTs with Suppressed Proton decay Due to Gauged Discrete Symmetry. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/335/1/012024

Paper [5] discusses GUT models that suppress proton decay, leading to exceptionally long lifetimes for elementary particles like the proton.

See more details
More for · 1
Recorded source metadata

Leah Broussard, A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, S. Syritsyn, Yasumichi Aoki, Joshua L. Barrow, Arnau Bas i Beneito, Z. Berezhiani, N. F. Calabria, S. Fajfer, Susan Gardner, Julian Heeck, Cailian Jiang, Luca Naterop, Alexey A. Petrov, R. Shrock, Adrian Thompson, U. V. Kolck, M. Wagman, Linyan Wan, J. Womersley, J. Yoo. Baryon Number Violation: From Nuclear Matrix Elements to BSM Physics. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/adf081

Paper [6] reviews baryon number violation physics, highlighting ongoing research into extremely long-lived elementary particles such as the proton.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8101 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt