trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Antimatter curves spacetime in the same direction as regular matter

the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - evenly split
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Whether antimatter curves spacetime in the same direction as regular matter (attraction) or the opposite (repulsion) is an active question in physics, with standard theory favoring regular attraction but alternative cosmological models and ongoing experiments investigating potential gravitational repulsion.

The analysis

The claim addresses whether antimatter curves spacetime like regular matter. Standard general relativity and indirect evidence assume ordinary gravitational attraction (tested by experiments like ALPHA), leading some papers to evaluate or anticipate standard behavior. However, several theoretical papers (e.g., lattice universe and CPT-extension models) specifically propose and explore the alternative hypothesis of gravitational repulsion between matter and antimatter. Because this remains a subject of active experimental testing with competing theoretical models, the status is contested.

The evidence we hold leans evenly split

How this was weighed

official record 3x · fact-check 2x · hedged 1x · crowd & reference 1x

  • Description and first application of a new technique to meas · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.3 · 2013
  • Prospects for comparison of matter and antimatter gravitatio · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.3 · 2018
  • On the nature of dark energy: the lattice Universe · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.3 · 2013
  • Antimatter gravity and the Universe · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.3 · 2019
Evidence for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Charman AE, Amole C, Ashkezari MD, Baquero-Ruiz M, Bertsche W, Butler E, Capra A, Cesar CL, Charlton M, Eriksson S, Fajans J, Friesen T, Fujiwara MC, Gill DR, Gutierrez A, Hangst JS, Hardy WN, Hayden ME, Isaac CA, Jonsell S, Kurchaninov L, Little A, Madsen N, McKenna JT, Menary S, Napoli SC, Nolan P, Olin A, Pusa P, Rasmussen CØ, Robicheaux F, Sarid E, Silveira DM, So C, Thompson RI, van der Werf DP, Wurtele JS, Zhmoginov AI. Description and first application of a new technique to measure the gravitational mass of antihydrogen.. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2787

Paper [2] notes that indirect evidence largely points to standard gravitational behavior for antimatter, adhering to the weak equivalence principle.

Evidence against · 2
Recorded source metadata

M. Villata. On the nature of dark energy: the lattice Universe. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1388-3

Paper [0] discusses theoretical models proposing mutual gravitational repulsion between matter and antimatter.

See more details
More for · 1
Recorded source metadata

Bertsche WA. Prospects for comparison of matter and antimatter gravitation with ALPHA-g.. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0265

Paper [6] discusses experimental programs designed to test antimatter gravitation, operating under standard physics assumptions that anticipate ordinary attractive gravitational behavior.

More against · 1
Recorded source metadata

D. Hajdukovic. Antimatter gravity and the Universe. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732320300013

Paper [5] reviews alternative cosmological paradigms that incorporate the hypothesis of gravitational repulsion between matter and antimatter.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → CONTESTED · 3601 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt