The Moon is capable of retaining a significant atmosphere

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

Recorded sources

0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Scientific evidence conclusively shows that the Moon does not have a significant atmosphere, possessing instead only a tenuous, collisionless exosphere containing a total mass of roughly 10 tons.

The analysis

The claim states that the Moon is capable of retaining a significant atmosphere. However, established lunar science and the retrieved literature (such as papers [7] and [8]) explicitly confirm that the Moon lacks a traditional collisional atmosphere, maintaining only a extremely tenuous and surface-bounded exosphere with a total mass of about 10 tons. Therefore, the claim is clearly refuted by the scientific consensus and evidence.

Evidence against · 2

Examining the Ballistic Transport of Sulfur-Bearing Volatile Species in the Lunar Exosphere

Recorded source metadata

Diana Hayes, Sébastien Verkercke, Liam Morrissey, John Moores. Examining the Ballistic Transport of Sulfur-Bearing Volatile Species in the Lunar Exosphere. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12859

The paper confirms that Earth's Moon lacks a collisional atmosphere and instead possesses only a sparse, surface-bounded collisionless exosphere.

Source citation format

See more details

More against · 1

Physics of plasma–surface–exosphere–dust coupling at the lunar surface for future exploration programmes

Recorded source metadata

Yoshifumi Futaana. Physics of plasma–surface–exosphere–dust coupling at the lunar surface for future exploration programmes. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6791

The paper notes that the total mass of the lunar atmosphere is extremely small, on the order of just 10 tons.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → REFUTED · 1001 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt