Male circumcision damages sexual sensitivity
High-quality systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and sensory testing studies refute the claim that male circumcision damages sexual sensitivity, consistently demonstrating that the procedure does not impair sexual function or pleasure.
The empirical literature, dominated by large-scale systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and high-quality studies (such as [0], [3], [6], [7], and [11]), consistently concludes that medical circumcision does not adversely impact penile sensitivity, sexual sensation, or sexual satisfaction. While a few lower-quality or smaller studies (such as [1]) report variable outcomes or subjective decreases in a minority of patients, the weight of high-quality evidence firmly contradicts the claim that circumcision damages sexual sensitivity.
S. Masood, H.R.H. Patel, R.C. Himpson, J.H. Palmer, G.R. Mufti, M.K.M. Sheriff. Penile Sensitivity and Sexual Satisfaction after Circumcision: Are We Informing Men Correctly?. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1159/000085930
One smaller study found variable outcomes on penile sensitivity, with a minority of patients reporting worsened sensation after circumcision.
Brian J. Morris, John N. Krieger. Does Male Circumcision Affect Sexual Function, Sensitivity, or Satisfaction?—A Systematic Review. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12293
Comprehensive systematic reviews and high-quality trials indicate that circumcision does not adversely affect penile sensitivity or sexual satisfaction.
See more details
B. Morris, J. Krieger. Male Circumcision Does Not Reduce Sexual Function, Sensitivity or Satisfaction. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4236/ASM.2015.53007
Authors reaffirm that high-quality randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses consistently show no reduction in sexual sensitivity or function following circumcision.
Morris B, Rivin BE, Sheldon M, Krieger JN. Neonatal Male Circumcision: Clearly Beneficial for Public Health or an Ethical Dilemma? A Systematic Review.. 2024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54772
A systematic review of neonatal circumcision concludes that the procedure rarely leads to later adverse effects on sexual function or pleasure.
Morris BJ, Moreton S, Bailis SA, Cox G, Krieger JN. Critical evaluation of contrasting evidence on whether male circumcision has adverse psychological effects: A systematic review.. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12482
Critical evaluation of psychological and sensory outcomes shows that quantitative sensory testing reveals no diminished touch or pain thresholds in circumcised men.
Moreton S, Cox G, Sheldon M, Bailis SA, Klausner JD, Morris BJ. Comments by opponents on the British Medical Association's guidance on non-therapeutic male circumcision of children seem one-sided and may undermine public health.. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v12.i5.244
Major public health and medical policy evaluations conclude that male circumcision does not impair sexual function and pleasure.
Michalina Grudzińska, J. Gondek, M. Czajkowski, Marcin Matuszewski. Impact of device-assisted circumcision on sexual quality of life in adult males: a systematic review.. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf191
A systematic review on device-assisted adult circumcision indicates that procedures either maintain or positively influence sexual quality of life and erectile function.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt