trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Self-selection bias significantly distorts experimental results over time.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Evidence from multiple methodological studies demonstrates that self-selection bias systematically skews participant pools, limiting the broader validity and generalizability of experimental results over time.

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently provide evidence that self-selection affects participant representation in psychological, behavioral, and survey studies, skewing results toward specific demographic or psychological profiles and necessitating caution or statistical correction.

Evidence for · 4
Recorded source metadata

I. Kaźmierczak, A. Zajenkowska, R. Rogoza, P. Jonason, D. Ścigała. Self-selection biases in psychological studies: Personality and affective disorders are prevalent among participants. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281046

Paper [0] demonstrates that self-selection in psychological studies attracts participants with distinct personality disorders, complicating the generalizability of results.

See more details
More for · 3
Recorded source metadata

A. Stone, Stefan Schneider, J. Smyth, D. U. Junghaenel, M. Couper, C. Wen, Marilyn Mendez, Sarah E Velasco, Sarah E Goldstein. A population-based investigation of participation rate and self-selection bias in momentary data capture and survey studies. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04426-2

Paper [1] finds significant participant selection biases based on personality, skills, and topic interest in survey and data capture studies.

Recorded source metadata

A. Haynes, E. Robinson. Who are we testing? Self-selection bias in laboratory-based eating behaviour studies.. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104330

Paper [3] shows that participant preferences significantly bias laboratory eating behaviour studies toward specific psychological profiles.

Recorded source metadata

Burkhard Peter, Lynae Roberts, Franz Anton Mesmer. Hypnotizability Norms may not be Representative of the General Population: Potential Sample and Self-Selection Bias Considerations. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2021.2003694

Paper [6] indicates that self-selection and sample bias mean hypnotizability norms and related experimental results may not represent the general population.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8701 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt