trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

All physical machines are linearly scalable

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

The claim that all physical machines are linearly scalable is false, as hardware performance is constrained by fundamental bottlenecks such as Amdahl's law, communication overhead, and physical properties like electron delocalization.

The analysis

The claim asserts a universal technological absolute ('All physical machines are linearly scalable'). In computer science and physics, physical machines and computing architectures invariably encounter bottlenecks—such as Amdahl's law, communication overhead in parallel systems, and physical constraints like heat dissipation or electron delocalization—that prevent linear scaling. Papers [2] and [5] explicitly discuss these deviations and limitations, directly refuting the claim. Therefore, the verdict is REFUTED.

Evidence against · 2
Recorded source metadata

Végh J. How Amdahl's Law limits the performance of large artificial neural networks : why the functionality of full-scale brain simulation on processor-based simulators is limited.. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-019-0097-2

Paper [2] demonstrates that physical machines and neural network simulators face performance saturation and scaling limitations governed by Amdahl's Law rather than being linearly scalable.

See more details
More against · 1
Recorded source metadata

Fabian MD, Shpiro B, Baer R. Linear Weak Scalability of Density Functional Theory Calculations without Imposing Electron Localization.. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00829

Paper [5] highlights that physical systems and material electron structures frequently experience deviations from linear scaling due to quantum confinement or delocalization.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1401 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt