trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Leading questions in polls significantly alter respondent opinions

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Methodological studies and survey experiments consistently demonstrate that leading questions, framing choices, and question wording significantly alter respondent opinions and survey outcomes.

The analysis

The claim that leading questions and survey design choices significantly alter respondent opinions is well-supported by methodological literature and survey experiments. Papers [1], [3], and [6] directly test and confirm that question wording, framing, and instrument design have powerful effects on expressed public opinion and survey results. There are no retrieved papers refuting this well-established psychometric finding.

Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

Tània Verge, R. Tormos. Shaping support for public policies: legitimacy cues and question wording effects in the case of gender quotas. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2022.2078336

Paper [1] demonstrates that question wording and framing cues significantly alter respondent support for controversial public policies in survey settings.

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

George Franklin Bishop. Instrument Design. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199545636.003.0022

Paper [3] provides foundational evidence that survey instrument design, question wording, and content directly change conclusions drawn regarding public opinion.

Recorded source metadata

Silverman D, Fealing C. Framing the Exit: Pollsters, Public Opinion, and the Politics of Military Withdrawal.. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf020

Paper [6] shows that pollsters' framing choices and response options strongly impact expressed public support for military withdrawals.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7901 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt