The death penalty deters violent crime

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

Recorded sources

0 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Empirical studies and historical analyses consistently indicate that capital punishment fails to provide a measurable deterrent effect against violent crime, contradicting classical deterrence theory.

The analysis

The retrieved literature specifically examining the death penalty (papers 2, 3, and 6) indicates that capital punishment does not deter violent crime, with studies showing no significant difference in crime rates based on the death penalty or pointing out severe methodological flaws in claims of marginal deterrence. Papers 0, 1, 8, 10, and 11 discuss general deterrence, workplace safety enforcement, corruption, or health care fraud, which are tangential or pertain to non-capital administrative and property crimes rather than the specific claim regarding the death penalty and violent crime. Papers 4, 5, 7, and 9 are entirely unrelated. Therefore, the claim is refuted by the direct evidence.

Evidence against · 3

THE DEATH PENALTY MEETS SOCIAL SCIENCE: Deterrence and Jury Behavior Under New Scrutiny

Recorded source metadata

R. Weisberg. THE DEATH PENALTY MEETS SOCIAL SCIENCE: Deterrence and Jury Behavior Under New Scrutiny. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.LAWSOCSCI.1.051804.082336

The review notes that while some newer econometric studies claim marginal deterrence, they face severe criticism for methodological flaws, omitting key variables, and anomaly distortions.

Source citation format

See more details

More against · 2

Capital Punishment and the Deterrence of Violent Crime in Comparable Counties

Recorded source metadata

Derral Cheatwood. Capital Punishment and the Deterrence of Violent Crime in Comparable Counties. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401689301800202

County-level matching analyses find that capital punishment variables do not account for any significant portion of differences in violent crime rates and show no deterrent effect.

Source citation format

Capital Punishment and Deterrence

Recorded source metadata

M. Watt Espy. Capital Punishment and Deterrence. 1980. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112878002600407

Historical examinations of executions demonstrate that capital punishment has failed as a means of deterring others from committing capital crimes.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → REFUTED · 901 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt