trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Hellmann-Feynman forces can be computed with Hartree-Fock theory

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Hellmann-Feynman forces can indeed be computed using Hartree-Fock theory, as supported by foundational and methodological literature on molecular force calculations.

The analysis

The retrieved papers [0] and [2] directly discuss computing Hellmann-Feynman forces and wave-function corrections within the Hartree-Fock framework. No papers refute the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Peter Habitz, Christian Votava. The Hellmann–Feynman theorem for approximate wave functions and its application to nonadiabatic coupling matrix elements with the aid of a coupled Hartree–Fock method. 1980. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.438971

Demonstrates the practical calculation of molecular forces and gradients at the Hartree-Fock level using the Hellmann-Feynman theorem.

See more details
More for · 1
Recorded source metadata

Eugene S. Kryachko. On wave‐function correction to Hellmann–Feynman force: Hartree–fock method. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560560103

Examines wave-function corrections to the Hellmann-Feynman force within the Hartree-Fock method, validating the theorem for finite basis sets.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8401 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt