trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Conspiracy belief is driven by specific cognitive mechanisms

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Multiple empirical studies demonstrate that specific cognitive mechanisms—including statistical biases, low cognitive reflection, intentionalizing biases, and hyper-systemizing—significantly drive belief in conspiracy theories.

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently point to various cognitive mechanisms, biases, and thinking styles (such as conjunction error, low cognitive reflection, proportion bias regarding event size, and jumping-to-conclusions biases) that predict or drive conspiratorial ideation. There are no papers refuting the link between cognitive mechanisms and conspiracy beliefs.

Evidence for · 5
Statistical Bias and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories
Recorded source metadata

Neil Dagnall, Andrew Denovan, Kenneth Drinkwater, Andrew Parker, Peter Clough. Statistical Bias and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3331

Statistical biases such as conjunction error and perception of randomness predict conspiratorial ideation.

See more details
More for · 4
Cognitive reflection and endorsement of the “great replacement” conspiracy theory
Recorded source metadata

Alexander Jedinger, Lena Masch, Axel M. Burger. Cognitive reflection and endorsement of the “great replacement” conspiracy theory. 2023. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.10825

Lower cognitive reflection and reflective thinking are associated with a greater endorsement of conspiracy theories.

The Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theory Beliefs: Big Events with Small Causes Amplify Conspiratorial Thinking
Recorded source metadata

Andrew Vonasch, Natasha Dore, Joelle Felicite. The Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theory Beliefs: Big Events with Small Causes Amplify Conspiratorial Thinking. 2022. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3j9xg

A cognitive tendency to explain big events with small, unappealing causes drives conspiracy theory beliefs.

Cognitive Biases Associated With Specific and Generalized Beliefs in Conspiracy Theory
Recorded source metadata

Peter J. Frost, Alyssa Simard, Lauren Iraci, Serena Stack, Carolyn Gould‐Faulkner, Abby Alexakos, Manny Fernandez, Shubham Oza. Cognitive Biases Associated With Specific and Generalized Beliefs in Conspiracy Theory. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70045

Specific cognitive biases from psychosis questionnaires, such as jumping to conclusions and intentionalizing, correlate with conspiracy beliefs.

The hyper-systemizing hypothesis: how the tendency to systemize influences conspiracy beliefs and belief inflexibility in clinical and general populations.
Recorded source metadata

Georgiou N, Delfabbro P, Balzan RP, Caruana N, Young R. The hyper-systemizing hypothesis: how the tendency to systemize influences conspiracy beliefs and belief inflexibility in clinical and general populations.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-025-01326-0

Systemizing tendencies and distinct cognitive profiles play a key role in the formation of conspiracy beliefs.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8501 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt