trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

People care about higher statistical moments in decision making under uncertainty

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Decision-making models and financial analyses frequently account for higher statistical moments, such as skewness and kurtosis, to better handle uncertainty.

The analysis

The claim is specific and empirical, dealing with behavioral and mathematical decision-making under uncertainty. The retrieved papers, particularly [0], [1], and [2], provide evidence that higher-order moments like skewness and kurtosis are incorporated into decision frameworks and utility functions. The other papers are off-topic clinical or educational studies.

Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

Emmanuel Jurczenko, Bertrand B. Maillet, Paul M. Merlin. Hedge Funds Portfolio Selection with Higher-Order Moments: A Non-Parametric Mean-Variance-Skewness-Kurtosis Efficient Frontier. 2005. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.676904

Paper [0] demonstrates that portfolio selection models optimize choices by incorporating higher-order moments such as skewness and kurtosis.

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Xueying Yu, Chuancun Yin. Some results on multivariate measures of elliptical and skew-elliptical distributions: higher-order moments, skewness and kurtosis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023370

Paper [1] discusses the importance of higher-order moments like skewness and kurtosis in characterizing return distributions.

Recorded source metadata

Wolf-Dieter Richter. Skewness-Kurtosis Controlled Higher Order Equivalent Decisions. 2016. https://doi.org/10.2174/1876527001607010001

Paper [2] evaluates how skewness and kurtosis parameters influence decision equivalence and asymptotic tests under uncertainty.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8201 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt