trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

New Keynesian modeling adequately addresses the Lucas critique

the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - evenly split
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

While New Keynesian DSGE models incorporate microfoundations and forward-looking behavior intended to surmount the Lucas critique, critics and empirical assessments highlight ongoing structural instabilities and discrepancies with real-world data.

The analysis

The claim addresses whether New Keynesian modeling adequately solves the Lucas critique. Paper [0] and [10] (in part) discuss how forward-looking structures and optimizations attempt to meet this challenge, while Paper [7] and the empirical residuals in [10] reflect ongoing critiques regarding structural stability and predictive failure in mainstream macroeconomics.

The evidence we hold leans evenly split

How this was weighed

official record 3x · fact-check 2x · hedged 1x · crowd & reference 1x

  • Assessing the Lucas Critique in Monetary Policy Models · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.05 · 2004
  • New Keynesian Optimal-Policy Models: An Empirical Assessment · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1 · 2004
  • Robert Boyer, Une discipline sans réflexivité peut-elle être · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1 · 2023
  • New Keynesian Optimal-Policy Models: An Empirical Assessment · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1 · 2004
Evidence for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Glenn D. Rudebusch. Assessing the Lucas Critique in Monetary Policy Models. 2004. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.549501

Paper [0] demonstrates that forward-looking macroeconomic specifications are relatively insensitive to policy shifts, offering a reconciliation with reduced-form stability that addresses aspects of the Lucas critique.

Evidence against · 2
Recorded source metadata

Yamada T. Robert Boyer, Une discipline sans réflexivité peut-elle être une science? Epistémologie de l’économie : Editions de la Sorbonne, 2021. 2023. https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC10035967

Paper [7] critiques mainstream macroeconomics, including its microfounded DSGE approaches, for losing relevance with observations and failing to adequately model changing socioeconomic regimes.

See more details
More for · 1
Recorded source metadata

Richard Dennis. New Keynesian Optimal-Policy Models: An Empirical Assessment. 2004. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.550441

Paper [10] estimates optimization-based sticky-price New Keynesian models to assess their empirical fit, showing how structural parameters can be evaluated under policy rules.

More against · 1
Recorded source metadata

Richard Dennis. New Keynesian Optimal-Policy Models: An Empirical Assessment. 2004. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.550441

Paper [10] notes that even the best-fitting New Keynesian specification displays characteristics and empirical failures that remain inconsistent with actual data.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → CONTESTED · 3201 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt