Congenitally deaf and mute people process thought using sign language and visual-spatial structures
Evidence indicates that congenitally deaf individuals rely heavily on visual-spatial modalities and sign language, exhibiting enhanced visual-spatial working memory and cognitive processing rooted in visual adaptation.
The claim is specific and empirical, dealing with cognitive processing in congenitally deaf individuals. Papers [0], [1], and [4] support the idea that sign language and visual-spatial structures form the basis of communication and cognitive processing in this population, while the remaining papers are either tangential or address unrelated sensory modalities.
Marc Marschark, Victoria S Everhart. Relations of Language and Cognition: What Do Deaf Children Tell Us?. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195100570.003.0001
Discusses how language development and thought are studied by examining children who grow up deaf and use sign language as their primary form of communication.
See more details
Ruth Campbell. Making Faces: Coextant Domains for Language and Visual Cognition. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195100570.003.0005
Examines signed languages in the context of cognitive interfaces, visual processes, and underlying structural constraints.
Veena C N, Hariharan V, Rajasekhar P P, Vastrad B C, Nandan T M. A STUDY ON VISUAL MEMORY AMONG CONGENITALLY DEAF CHILDREN. 2022. https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar/2101969
Shows that congenitally deaf children demonstrate superior visual memory and cross-modal plasticity, utilizing visual strengths for cognitive tasks.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt