trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The normal duration of human sexual intercourse falls within a specific empirical timeframe

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Empirical studies confirm that the duration of human sexual intercourse and related physiological markers fall within specific, measurable timeframes.

The analysis

The claim is specific and falsifiable, passing Step 0. The retrieved literature contains multiple clinical and physiological studies measuring the duration of sexual intercourse, erection times, and ejaculatory latencies using specific empirical metrics like stopwatches and latency timers. Therefore, the claim is supported by the provided evidence.

Evidence for · 4
What Are the Physical Demands of Sexual Intercourse? A Systematic Review of the Literature
Recorded source metadata

J. M. Oliva-Lozano, F. Alacid, P. López-Miñarro, J. Muyor. What Are the Physical Demands of Sexual Intercourse? A Systematic Review of the Literature. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02246-8

Paper 1 notes that sexual intercourse has a measurable activity duration that elicits specific physiological demands.

See more details
More for · 3
Duration of Erection: Does It Really Matter? A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Assess the Impact of Vardenafil ODT on Duration of Erection and Its Correlation with Patients' and Partners' Sexual Quality of Life and Duration of Intercourse: The VADEOPEN Study
Recorded source metadata

Antonio Martin-Morales, Pedro Gutiérrez-Hernández, Javier Romero-Otero, José A. Romero-Martín. Duration of Erection: Does It Really Matter? A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Assess the Impact of Vardenafil ODT on Duration of Erection and Its Correlation with Patients' and Partners' Sexual Quality of Life and Duration of Intercourse: The VADEOPEN Study. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12496

Paper 3 evaluates stopwatch-assessed duration of erection leading to successful intercourse as an empirical efficacy endpoint.

(125) Efficacy of Hilti Gold vs. Epimedyumlu Macun in Duration of Erection and Its Correlation with Partners ´Sexual Quality of Life
Recorded source metadata

K. Drasa, E. Bylykbashi. (125) Efficacy of Hilti Gold vs. Epimedyumlu Macun in Duration of Erection and Its Correlation with Partners ´Sexual Quality of Life. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae002.113

Paper 7 reports that the average duration of sexual intercourse in healthy men falls within a specific timeframe of nine to ten minutes.

Distribution and relation of arousal to ejaculatory latency time, erection to ejaculation latency time, and intravaginal ejaculation latency time in Indian men: A pilot study
Recorded source metadata

Shubham Jhanwar, J. Rohilla. Distribution and relation of arousal to ejaculatory latency time, erection to ejaculation latency time, and intravaginal ejaculation latency time in Indian men: A pilot study. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_277_21

Paper 10 measures specific empirical latencies such as intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) in clinical studies.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8401 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt