trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

A specific amount of sleep is required for peak cognitive performance

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Ample scientific evidence indicates that getting a specific and adequate amount of sleep is crucial for optimal cognitive performance, whereas sleep restriction leads to measurable cognitive deficits.

The analysis

The claim is specific, empirical, and falsifiable. Multiple retrieved papers, including narrative reviews, Mendelian randomization studies, and population analyses, consistently support the position that adequate sleep duration is linked to better cognitive outcomes and that short sleep causes cognitive impairment.

Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

Conti F. Dietary Protocols to Promote and Improve Restful Sleep: A Narrative Review.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf062

Dietary and lifestyle reviews emphasize that failing to meet recommended sleep durations of 7-9 hours impairs memory and cognitive functions.

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Yunyun Guo. Mendelian randomization study of self-reported long sleep duration, short sleep duration, and insomnia and cognitive function. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330782

Mendelian randomization analysis demonstrates a causal link between short sleep duration and declines in cognitive and memory performance.

Recorded source metadata

Yanfei Zhang, Bo Wang, Nan Jin, Yihao Wang, Guorui Liu. The impact of physical activity intensity and sleep duration on cognitive function: The mediating and moderating roles of sleep duration. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/slp2.70018

Empirical data confirms that sleep duration positively predicts cognitive performance and buffers against cognitive deficits.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7901 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt