trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Abortions cause breast cancer

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

Recorded sources

0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Major medical organizations and fact-checkers have extensively investigated the claim that abortions cause breast cancer and concluded that there is no causal link.

How claims like this are judged

Judged against fact-checker rulings and reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the fact-checking record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence against · 4

AFP Fact Check: Misinformation about abortion safety spreads via US podcast

Recorded source metadata

AFP Fact Check: Misinformation about abortion safety spreads via US podcast. AFP Fact Check. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.66R24KE

Fact-checker ruling: False

Source citation format

See more details

More against · 3

Snopes: Are Abortions Linked to an Increased Risk of Breast Cancer?

Recorded source metadata

Snopes: Are Abortions Linked to an Increased Risk of Breast Cancer?. Snopes. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/abortion-breast-cancer-link/

Fact-checker ruling: False

Source citation format

2 recorded entries grouped as this source

Additional records of the same source are shown below. They are not counted as additional sources.

snopes.com: Are Abortions Linked to an Increased Risk of Breast Cancer? | Snopes.com

Recorded source metadata

snopes.com: Are Abortions Linked to an Increased Risk of Breast Cancer? | Snopes.com. snopes.com. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/abortion-breast-cancer-link/

Fact-checker ruling: reviewed

Source citation format

misbar.com: No Evidence Abortion Causes Breast Cancer

Recorded source metadata

misbar.com: No Evidence Abortion Causes Breast Cancer. misbar.com. https://www.misbar.com/en/factcheck/2021/09/07/no-evidence-abortion-causes-breast-cancer

Fact-checker ruling: fake

Source citation format

Wikipedia: Abortion–breast cancer hypothesis

Recorded source metadata

Wikipedia: Abortion–breast cancer hypothesis. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion%E2%80%93breast_cancer_hypothesis

Reference article covering this claim directly

Source citation format

2 recorded entries grouped as this source

Additional records of the same source are shown below. They are not counted as additional sources.

en.wikipedia.org: Abortion–breast cancer hypothesis

Recorded source metadata

en.wikipedia.org: Abortion–breast cancer hypothesis. en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion%E2%80%93breast_cancer_hypothesis

Explains that scientific inquiry has concluded abortion does not cause breast cancer and major bodies reject it.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → REFUTED · 001 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt