trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

It is safer to keep houses unlit at night

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Evidence strongly refutes the idea that unlit houses are safer, demonstrating instead that lighting reduces nighttime offenses and is standard practice for safety and security.

The analysis

The claim posits that keeping houses unlit at night is safer, which contradicts extensive situational crime prevention literature and safety standards showing that adequate lighting deters crime and increases safety. Papers [2], [3], and [4] all support the necessity of illumination for safety and security, providing direct evidence against the claim. Therefore, the balance of evidence clearly refutes the claim.

Evidence against · 3
Recorded source metadata

David Mitre-Becerril, Matthew Spencer. Illuminating Crime Prevention: Evidence from Washington, DC's Street Lighting Upgrade. 2026. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6138426

Paper [2] demonstrates that upgrading street lighting leads to significant reductions in nighttime offenses without crime displacement.

See more details
More against · 2
Recorded source metadata

ISO/CIE 8995-3:2018(E) Lighting of Work Places ? Part 3: Lighting Requirements for Safety and Security of Outdoor Work Places. https://doi.org/10.25039/ds8995-3.2018

Paper [3] outlines international lighting standards specifically established for the safety and security of outdoor areas.

Recorded source metadata

Nicole Hathaway, Manuel Lopez. Adaptive Lighting in Outdoor Security Applications. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/036063252105101114

Paper [4] notes that areas with heightened security requirements maintain illumination to ensure safety.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 201 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt