trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Mobile phones interfere with the normal functioning of cardiac pacemakers

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
7 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Multiple studies demonstrate that mobile phones can produce electromagnetic interference capable of disrupting the normal functioning of cardiac pacemakers when held in close proximity.

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently document that electromagnetic emissions from mobile phones can cause interference with cardiac pacemakers, particularly at close ranges, although newer devices and newer cellular generations have varying risk profiles.

Evidence for · 7
Recorded source metadata

A. A. Klein, George Djaiani. Mobile phones in the hospital – past, present and future. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03079.x

States that the phenomenon of electromagnetic interference by mobile phones is real and can cause malfunction of medical equipment when used in close proximity.

See more details
More for · 6
Recorded source metadata

Juna Misiri, Fred Kusumoto, Nora Goldschlager. Electromagnetic Interference and Implanted Cardiac Devices: The Nonmedical Environment (Part I). 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.21998

Highlights that cardiovascular implantable electronic devices can potentially be interfered with by electromagnetic signals from modern technology.

Recorded source metadata

Alexandre Trigano, Alain Azoulay, M. Rochdi, ALEXIS CAMPILLO. <b>Electromagnetic Interference of External Pacemakers by Walkie‐Talkies and Digital Cellular Phones</b>: Experimental Study. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00499.x

Demonstrates experimentally that digital cellular phones can cause disturbances such as pacing inhibition and asynchronous pacing in pacemakers.

Recorded source metadata

Takuya Nojima, Osamu Fujiwara, Jianqing Wang. A model for predicting electromagnetic interference of implanted cardiac pacemakers by mobile telephones. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/22.884203

Presents a computer model predicting electromagnetic interference of pacemakers caused by mobile telephones.

Recorded source metadata

Federica Censi, Giovanni Calcagnini, Michele Triventi, Eugenio Mattei, P. Bartolini. Interference between mobile phones and pacemakers: a look inside.. 2007. https://openalex.org/W2416279634

Analyzes the mechanisms of electromagnetic interference between mobile telephones and cardiac pacemakers, noting how RF signals can affect pacemaker function.

Recorded source metadata

Yuta Endo, Kazuyuki Saito, Shun Kojima, Soichi Watanabe, Masaharu Takahashi, Koichi Ito. Evaluation of electromagnetic interference to implanted cardiac pacemaker due to mobile phone. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/iceaa.2013.6632221

Evaluates electromagnetic interference to implanted cardiac pacemakers due to mobile phones using realistic phone models.

Recorded source metadata

Jaafar Qassim Kadhim, Hassan Hamed Naji, Sazan K. AL-jaff. Modeling and simulation of electromagnetic interference from 2G–6G mobile phones on implanted cardiac pacemakers. 2025. https://doi.org/10.37868/sei.v7i2.id594

Shows through simulation-based analysis that mobile phones within close proximity can induce electric fields exceeding pacemaker immunity thresholds.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked02 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8902 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt