trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Obese patients in the US are commonly sent to zoos for CT scans

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

While tabloid reports have claimed that obese patients in the US are frequently sent to zoos for CT scans, formal investigations and surveys show this is not a common practice.

How claims like this are judged

Judged against fact-checker rulings and reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the fact-checking record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence against · 2
Recorded source metadata

skeptics.stackexchange.com: Are obese patients in the US commonly sent to zoos for CT scans?. skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/40288/are-obese-patients-in-the-us-commonly-sent-to-zoos-for-ct-scans

Examines a tabloid claim about US patients being sent to zoos for scans, noting it lacks credibility.

See more details
More against · 1
Recorded source metadata

doi.org: The Challenge of CT and MRI Imaging of Obese Individuals Who Present to the Emergency Department: A National Survey. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.410

Study evaluating animal facilities as alternate sources for CT imaging of obese patients, showing it is not a common practice.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1031 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt