A single vote has historically decided the outcome of major political elections

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

Recorded sources

0 sources for · 5 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Political science literature establishes that due to the massive size of modern electorates, the mathematical probability of a single vote deciding a major election is exceedingly low.

The analysis

The claim states that a single vote has historically decided the outcome of major political elections. However, multiple scholarly sources explicitly discuss the 'paradox of voting,' noting that in modern states with millions of voters, the probability of any single vote being pivotal is practically zero. Therefore, the claim is refuted by standard political science consensus regarding voter pivotality.

Evidence against · 5

Epistemic Barriers to Rational Voting: The Case of European Parliament Elections

Recorded source metadata

Fabio Wolkenstein. Epistemic Barriers to Rational Voting: The Case of European Parliament Elections. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1709104

States that voting is often considered irrational because of the incredibly small likelihood that an individual voter's ballot will be pivotal.

Source citation format

See more details

More against · 4

9. Votes, Elections, Legislatures, and Legislators

Recorded source metadata

Peter Ferdinand. 9. Votes, Elections, Legislatures, and Legislators. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198704386.003.0010

Notes that the huge number of citizens in any modern state means no individual's vote is likely to make the difference between choices.

Source citation format

12. Votes, Elections, Legislatures, and Legislators

Recorded source metadata

Peter Ferdinand, Robert Garner, Stephanie Lawson. 12. Votes, Elections, Legislatures, and Legislators. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198787983.003.0012

Reiterates that in modern states with large electorates, an individual vote is extremely unlikely to change an election outcome.

Source citation format

11. Votes, Elections, Legislatures, and Legislators

Recorded source metadata

Peter Ferdinand. 11. Votes, Elections, Legislatures, and Legislators. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780192847713.003.0011

Explains that the vast number of citizens in a modern state makes it improbable for any single vote to make a difference.

Source citation format

11. Votes, Elections, Legislatures, and Legislators

Recorded source metadata

Peter Ferdinand. 11. Votes, Elections, Legislatures, and Legislators. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198820611.003.0011

Affirms that the large size of modern electorates renders the probability of a single vote deciding an election vanishingly small.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked31 Jul 2026

judged → REFUTED · 431 Jul 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt