trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Whiteheads occasions of experience are fundamentally relational

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Whiteheads occasions of experience are fundamentally relational?

Yes. Scholarly literature on Whitehead's process philosophy overwhelmingly supports the view that actual occasions and process-based entities are fundamentally relational and defined by internal relations rather than simple location.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently characterize Whitehead's actual occasions and process ontology as inherently relational, rejecting substantialist metaphysics and simple location in favor of internal relations and co-creative interdependence.

Evidence for · 5
2011
Get citation
Kaplický, M. (2011). Aesthetics in the Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.82

See more details
More for · 4
2025
Get citation
Sayapin, V. O. (2025). The Becoming of Being: Process Ontology of Whitehead and Transductive Individuation of Simondon. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2025.7.75276

2021
Get citation
Ferrari, F. M. (2021). PROCESS-BASED ENTITIES ARE RELATIONAL STRUCTURES. From Whitehead to Structuralism. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n1.ff

2021
Get citation
H, B., S, B., J, H., A, C., & D, C. (2021). From ego to eco: re-orienting for processual ontology in the "Dao-Field".. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10028-w

2020
Get citation
A, G. & J, A. (2020). When the Part Mirrors the Whole: Interactions Beyond "Simple Location".. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.523885

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers consistently characterize Whitehead's actual occasions and process ontology as inherently relational, rejecting substantialist metaphysics and simple location in favor of internal relations and co-creative interdependence.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7904 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work