trustmebro.to/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

White asbestos is dangerous

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that white asbestos is dangerous?

Yes. Extensive toxicological and epidemiological evidence confirms that white asbestos (chrysotile) is a dangerous, Group 1 human carcinogen capable of causing severe lung damage, fibrosis, and cancer.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 4 Aug 2026

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently characterize chrysotile (white asbestos) as a dangerous substance, noting its high toxicity, carcinogenicity, and classification as an IARC Group 1 agent. There are no papers refuting its dangers.

Evidence for · 5

Solubility of chrysotile asbestos and basalt fibers in relation to their fibrogenic and carcinogenic action.

1994

Demonstrates that white asbestos (chrysotile) is toxic, fibrogenic, and carcinogenic in animal models.

Get citation

Kogan, F. M. & Nikitina, O. (1994). Solubility of chrysotile asbestos and basalt fibers in relation to their fibrogenic and carcinogenic action.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.94102s5205

See more details

More for · 4

Dual phase modeling of Chrysotile carcinogenesis from 3D cell transformation to orthotopic tumors.

2026

Establishes chrysotile asbestos as a well-established carcinogen capable of inducing malignant cell transformations and tumors.

Get citation

Y, G., W, Y., R, L., Q, W., M, Z., Y, Z., H, X., F, Z., & L, Z. (2026). Dual phase modeling of Chrysotile carcinogenesis from 3D cell transformation to orthotopic tumors.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08158-0

Comparison of the toxicity/carcinogenicity of regulated and unregulated mineral fibres using the Fibre Potential Toxicity Index (FPTI)

2025

Classifies chrysotile as an IARC Group 1 carcinogenic agent based on quantitative toxicity models.

Get citation

AF, G. & M, L. (2025). Comparison of the toxicity/carcinogenicity of regulated and unregulated mineral fibres using the Fibre Potential Toxicity Index (FPTI). europepmc.org. https://europepmc.org/article/AGR/IND609306607

Health, Work, Invisibilities and Collective Resistance in an Asbestos-Exposed Territory in the Pedro Leopoldo Region, (MG), Brazil.

2026

Identifies asbestos as a Group 1 carcinogen responsible for severe health liabilities and diseases in exposed populations.

Get citation

EG, F. & AC, G. (2026). Health, Work, Invisibilities and Collective Resistance in an Asbestos-Exposed Territory in the Pedro Leopoldo Region, (MG), Brazil.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23030315

Comparison of the toxicity/carcinogenicity of regulated and unregulated mineral fibres using the Fibre Potential Toxicity Index (FPTI).

2025

Confirms chrysotile's classification as a Group 1 human carcinogen using the Fibre Potential Toxicity Index.

Get citation

AF, G. & M, L. (2025). Comparison of the toxicity/carcinogenicity of regulated and unregulated mineral fibres using the Fibre Potential Toxicity Index (FPTI).. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139202

Related receipts

Is it true that Tardigrades are dangerous to humans? REFUTED related question, same topic
Is it true that Tardigrades are dangerous to other animals? PARTIAL LEAN related question, same topic
Is it true that asbestos fibres are absorbed through the skin into the body? REFUTED related question, same topic

What does the evidence say?

Receipt History

first checked04 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8604 Aug 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work