trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Water flowing downhill follows the path of steepest descent as a first-order approximation

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that water flowing downhill follows the path of steepest descent as a first-order approximation?

Water flowing downhill following the path of steepest descent is a foundational physical principle based on gravity and basic topography, requiring no citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states a fundamental physical truism regarding gravity and fluid flow on slopes (water follows the path of steepest descent as a first-order approximation), which is common knowledge in earth sciences and everyday observation. Papers on landscape evolution and hydrology assume this baseline without needing it as a contested hypothesis.

What does the evidence say?

The claim states a fundamental physical truism regarding gravity and fluid flow on slopes (water follows the path of steepest descent as a first-order approximation), which is common knowledge in earth sciences and everyday observation. Papers on landscape evolution and hydrology assume this baseline without needing it as a contested hypothesis.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9505 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work