Visual acuity, refractive error, and intraocular pressure are mathematically and clinically correlated eyesight measures.

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that visual acuity, refractive error, and intraocular pressure are mathematically and clinically correlated eyesight measures?

Yes. Clinical and mathematical measures of eyesight, such as visual acuity, refractive error, and intraocular pressure, show clear interrelations in ophthalmic research.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 4 Aug 2026

The analysis

The provided literature consistently supports the clinical and mathematical connections among visual acuity, refractive error, and intraocular pressure (IOP). Multiple studies demonstrate correlations between refractive error and IOP (such as myopic shifts correlating with IOP changes), as well as direct assessments coupling visual acuity and refractive error. No papers refute these relationships.

Evidence for · 5

Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

2019

Get citation

Wisse, R., Muijzer, M., Cassano, F., Godefrooij, D., Prevoo, Y., & Soeters, N. (2019). Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2196/14808

See more details

More for · 4

The relationship between intraocular pressure and refractive error adjusting for age and central corneal thickness

2003

Get citation

Nomura, H., Ando, F., Niino, N., Shimokata, H., & Miyake, Y. (2003). The relationship between intraocular pressure and refractive error adjusting for age and central corneal thickness. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00158.x

Longitudinal changes in intraocular pressure and association with systemic factors and refractive error: Lingtou Eye Cohort Study

2018

Get citation

Han, X., Yang, T., Zhang, J., Yu, S., Guo, X., Yan, W., Hu, Y., & He, M. (2018). Longitudinal changes in intraocular pressure and association with systemic factors and refractive error: Lingtou Eye Cohort Study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019416

Relationship between dynamic visual acuity and static visual acuity, refractive error, and binocular vision in elite soccer players

2024

Get citation

Jorge, J. & Jorge, J. P. (2024). Relationship between dynamic visual acuity and static visual acuity, refractive error, and binocular vision in elite soccer players. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2301981

Volume measurement of the vitrectomised eye and its applications in practice.

2024

Get citation

S, A., PM, S., DK, M., R, R., HN, R., P, S., H, S., & S, S. (2024). Volume measurement of the vitrectomised eye and its applications in practice.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_3237_23

What does the evidence say?

Receipt History

first checked04 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8604 Aug 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work