✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Two valid logical deductions from independent sets of assumptions can yield contradictory conclusions if the assumptions are inconsistent.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Is it true that two valid logical deductions from independent sets of assumptions can yield contradictory conclusions if the assumptions are inconsistent?
Yes. Logical consequence principles confirm that arguments derived from a contradictory or inconsistent collection of premises can be formally valid while yielding contradictory conclusions.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 1 source for, 0 against · Last checked
How claims like this are judged
Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.
Evidence for · 1
Notes that an argument from a contradictory collection of premises to any conclusion is valid, meaning incompatible assumptions can lead to contradictory conclusions.
Get citation
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Logical Consequence. (n.d.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-consequence/
Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work