Two different phonemic symbols can represent the identical acoustic sound
Is it true that two different phonemic symbols can represent the identical acoustic sound?
The claim that two different phonemic symbols can represent the identical acoustic sound is a matter of basic linguistic and phonetic definition (e.g., allophones or sounds shared across different writing systems/languages can be transcribed differently while having identical acoustic properties), so no citation is needed.
Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The claim refers to a definitional aspect of phonetics and phonology. Different transcription systems, broad vs. narrow transcription, or allophonic variations can result in different symbols representing the same acoustic realization. This is common knowledge in linguistics and requires no empirical confirmation from the provided literature.
What does the evidence say?
The claim refers to a definitional aspect of phonetics and phonology. Different transcription systems, broad vs. narrow transcription, or allophonic variations can result in different symbols representing the same acoustic realization. This is common knowledge in linguistics and requires no empirical confirmation from the provided literature.
Receipt History
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work