trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

True selflessness and pure altruism do not exist in human behavior

the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - evenly split
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that true selflessness and pure altruism do not exist in human behavior?

Partly. The existence of true selflessness and pure altruism remains a debated topic, with evolutionary models and resource control theories suggesting that seemingly altruistic behaviors often serve underlying adaptive or competitive functions, while psychological and sociological research documents genuine impartial concern and prosocial tendencies in human populations.

Verdict: CONTESTED · 2 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved literature addresses the evolutionary, biological, and psychological bases of prosociality and altruism. Some papers (e.g., resource control theory and kin selection models) argue that altruistic behaviors serve evolutionary fitness, kin selection, or resource acquisition functions, which complicates the notion of 'pure' selflessness. Other papers highlight impartial beneficence and broad prosocial propensities as distinct psychological dimensions in humans. Because the sources present competing interpretations regarding the ultimate drivers and existence of selfless behavior, the overall balance is contested.

The evidence we hold leans evenly split

How this was weighed

official record 3x · fact-check 2x · hedged 1x · crowd & reference 1x

  • Ontogeny and social dominance: a developmental view of human · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.05 · 2014
  • Survival cost sharing among altruistic full siblings in Mend · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.05 · 2024
  • Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitar · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.6 · 2018
  • Prosociality predicts connectedness with nature and soil. · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1 · 2026
Evidence for · 2
Ontogeny and social dominance: a developmental view of human power patterns.
2014
Resource control theory challenges the assumption that prosociality is purely altruistic, arguing that prosocial behavior serves competitive evolutionary functions similar to coercion.
Get citation
PH, H. (2014). Ontogeny and social dominance: a developmental view of human power patterns.. europepmc.org. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/25299882

Evidence against · 2
Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology.
2018
partial
Get citation
G, K., JAC, E., BD, E., L, C., NS, F., MJ, C., & J, S. (2018). Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000093

See more details
More for · 1
Survival cost sharing among altruistic full siblings in Mendelian population.
2024
Evolutionary models of altruistic food sharing show that behaviors meeting the criteria for altruism are stably maintained under specific genetic and demographic conditions.
Get citation
J, G., I, L., Z, V., V, C., & TF, M. (2024). Survival cost sharing among altruistic full siblings in Mendelian population.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02317-z

More against · 1
Prosociality predicts connectedness with nature and soil.
2026
partial
Get citation
A, N., G, P., M, C., & PW, S. (2026). Prosociality predicts connectedness with nature and soil.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1803464

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved literature addresses the evolutionary, biological, and psychological bases of prosociality and altruism. Some papers (e.g., resource control theory and kin selection models) argue that altruistic behaviors serve evolutionary fitness, kin selection, or resource acquisition functions, which complicates the notion of 'pure' selflessness. Other papers highlight impartial beneficence and broad prosocial propensities as distinct psychological dimensions in humans. Because the sources present competing interpretations regarding the ultimate drivers and existence of selfless behavior, the overall balance is contested.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → CONTESTED · 3305 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work