Tradable pollution permits correct long-run negative externalities by internalizing social costs into market prices
Is it true that Tradable pollution permits correct long-run negative externalities by internalizing social costs into market prices?
Yes. Tradable pollution permits and market-based mechanisms internalize social costs into market prices, helping to correct negative externalities over the long term.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The provided literature supports the core economic theory that market-based environmental policy instruments, such as tradable permits and emissions trading systems, internalize external costs, incentivize green technology adoption, and improve long-run environmental and economic efficiency.
Get citation
Kraemer, R. A., Kampa, E., & Interwies, E. (2004). The Role of Tradable Permits in Water Pollution Control. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.18235/0011164
See more details
Get citation
Bai, Y. & Yang, X. (2016). The Research on the Economic Effect of Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.4236/JSS.2016.44006
Get citation
L, Z., S, M., Y, D., & W, T. (2026). The impact of carbon emission trading pilot policy on China's energy eco-efficiency.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-026-00451-3
What does the evidence say?
The provided literature supports the core economic theory that market-based environmental policy instruments, such as tradable permits and emissions trading systems, internalize external costs, incentivize green technology adoption, and improve long-run environmental and economic efficiency.
Receipt History
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work