trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Tit-for-tat strategies can be sustained as a Nash equilibrium in repeated games with sufficient discount factors

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Tit-for-tat strategies can be sustained as a Nash equilibrium in repeated games with sufficient discount factors?

The sustainability of tit-for-tat and cooperative strategies as equilibria in repeated games based on discount factors is a foundational result of game theory (the Folk Theorems) and does not require citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim refers to a standard, foundational mathematical result in game theory (the Folk Theorems regarding repeated games and discount factors). As a textbook definition and core tenet of game-theoretic analysis, it is common knowledge within the discipline and requires no empirical citation.

What does the evidence say?

The claim refers to a standard, foundational mathematical result in game theory (the Folk Theorems regarding repeated games and discount factors). As a textbook definition and core tenet of game-theoretic analysis, it is common knowledge within the discipline and requires no empirical citation.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9505 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work