trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

There is a seasonal difference in the average cloud floor

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that there is a seasonal difference in the average cloud floor?

Yes. Multiple empirical studies analyzing cloud ceilings, low-level cloud bases, and boundary layer heights across diverse geographic regions confirm that there are observable seasonal differences in the average cloud floor.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim asserts that there is a seasonal difference in the average cloud floor. One study, one study, and one study all directly examine seasonal variations or trends in cloud ceiling heights, low-level cloud base heights (CBH), or planetary boundary layer heights across different regions (California, Poland, and India, respectively), consistently demonstrating empirical differences across seasons. Therefore, the claim is supported by the retrieved literature.

Evidence for · 3
Climatic context and ecological implications of summer fog decline in the coast redwood region.
2010
Get citation
JA, J. & TE, D. (2010). Climatic context and ecological implications of summer fog decline in the coast redwood region.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0915062107

See more details
More for · 2
Long‐term variability of the low‐level cloud base height in Poland
2023
Get citation
Matuszko, D., Bartoszek, K., & Soroka, J. (2023). Long‐term variability of the low‐level cloud base height in Poland. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8041

Examining Planetary Boundary Layer Height Climatology, Trends, and Variability over India using High-Resolution Indian Reanalysis
2023
Get citation
Shukla, K. K., Attada, R., & Pathaikara, A. (2023). Examining Planetary Boundary Layer Height Climatology, Trends, and Variability over India using High-Resolution Indian Reanalysis. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3379875/v1

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8605 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work