trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
There is a negative association between habitat quality and reproductive success in birds
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 2 against

Evidence in avian ecology generally points to a positive association between habitat quality and reproductive success (higher success in better habitats or heterogeneous landscapes), directly contradicting the claim of a negative association.

Evidence against · 2
2019 · cited by 40
Discusses how landscape heterogeneity and agricultural intensification disrupt expected positive effects, but generally shows positive relationships between habitat quality/heterogeneity and reproduct
See more details
The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

More against · 1
2006 · cited by 15
Demonstrates that avian reproductive success is highest in territories containing superior habitat attributes (tall shrubland/closed heathland).
Everything we examined (23) — 20 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Wikipedia: Habitatreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  2. Cooper Ornithological Society: Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds in western landscapes : contrasts with paradigms from the eastern United Statesreferencesame source L2no side takennot shown: took no side on this claim
  3. University of California Press: Population demography of northern spotted owlsreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. Oxford University Press: Dispersal ecology and evolutionreferencesame source L4no side takennot shown: took no side on this claim
  5. IALE(UK): Avian landscape ecology : pure and applied issues in the large-scale ecology of birds : proceedings of the eleventh Annual IALE(UK) Conference, held at University of East Anglia, 10th-13th September 2002referenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Cambridge University Press: Birds and climate change : impacts and conservation responsesreferencesame source L6no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Oxford University Press: Dispersalreferencesame source L4no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Cambridge University Press: The little owl : conservation, ecology and behavior of Athene noctuareferencesame source L6no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Cooper Ornithological Society: Ecology and conservation of grassland birds of the western hemisphere : proceedings of a conference, Tulsa, Oklahoma, October 1995referencesame source L2no side takennot shown: took no side on this claim
  10. گردشگری و اوقات فراغت: The impact of bird watching in the development of rural tourism (Case Study: Villages Around the Heshilan Lagoon)peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. Ecological Solutions and Evidence: Can pasture‐fed livestock farming practices improve the ecological condition of grassland in Great Britain?peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. Ecology and Evolution: American marten occupancy and activity patterns at the southern extent of their range in the eastern United Statespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  13. Frontiers in Microbiology: Is Long-Term Heavy Metal Exposure Driving Carriage of Antibiotic Resistance in Environmental Opportunistic Pathogens: A Comprehensive Phenomic and Genomic Assessment Using Serratia sp. SRS-8-S-peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  14. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering: Seasonal Length-Weight Relationships and Condition Factors of Mystus tengara (Hamilton, 1822) in Two Habitatspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  15. Geo: Geography and Environment: Exploring the relationship between bird diversity and anxiety and mood disorder hospitalisation ratespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  16. OpenAIRE: Ontogenetic variability in the habitat associations of Haliotis iris in central New Zealandpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  17. OpenAIRE: Individual and Temporal Variation in Habitat Association of an Alien Carnivore at Its Invasion Frontpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  18. OpenAIRE: Corrigendum to: Interactions between the introduced European honey bee and native bees in urban areas varies by year, habitat type and native bee guildpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  19. OpenAIRE: Competitive displacement or biotic resistance? Disentangling relationships between community diversity and invasion success of tall herbs and shrubspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  20. OpenAIRE: Habitat Partitioning among Size Classes of Larval Southern Leopard Frogs, Rana utriculariapeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  21. OpenAIRE: Indications of habitat association of Australopithecus robustus in the Bloubank Valley, South Africapeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  22. Landscape homogenization due to agricultural intensification disrupts the relationship between reproductive success and main prey abundance in an avian predatorpeer-reviewedrefutes
  23. Territory quality, survival and reproductive success in southern emu‐wrens <i>Stipiturus malachurus</i>peer-reviewedrefutes
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1905 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt