trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

There is a gravitational analogue of the classical Rutherford atom

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that there is a gravitational analogue of the classical Rutherford atom?

Yes. Gravitational analogues of Rutherford scattering are well-established in theoretical physics and orbital mechanics literature, describing how masses or charged bodies deflect in gravitational fields analogously to classical electrostatic scattering.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim asserts the existence of a gravitational analogue of the classical Rutherford atom/scattering. Multiple physics papers (e.g., [3], [6], [8]) explicitly investigate, model, and apply 'gravitational Rutherford scattering' and related orbital mechanics, fully supporting the claim. No papers refute it.

Evidence for · 3
2020
Get citation
Fathi, M., Olivares, M., & Villanueva, J. (2020). Gravitational Rutherford scattering of electrically charged particles from a charged Weyl black hole. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01441-9

See more details
More for · 2
2015
Get citation
Villanueva, J. & Olivares, M. (2015). Gravitational Rutherford scattering and Keplerian orbits for electrically charged bodies in heterotic string theory. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3794-x

2021
Get citation
Golubev, Y., Grushevskii, A., Korianov, V. V., Tuchin, A. G., & Tuchin, D. (2021). Rutherford's extended formula and optimization of the gravity assists beam modeling in the Solar system. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.20948/PREPR-2021-6

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

The claim asserts the existence of a gravitational analogue of the classical Rutherford atom/scattering. Multiple physics papers (e.g., [3], [6], [8]) explicitly investigate, model, and apply 'gravitational Rutherford scattering' and related orbital mechanics, fully supporting the claim. No papers refute it.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8304 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work