✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
There are exceptions to the principle of the excluded middle in logic
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that there are exceptions to the principle of the excluded middle in logic?
Yes. Non-classical logical systems, such as intuitionistic logic, quantum logic, and certain paraconsistent or partial frameworks, explicitly reject or do not require the law of the excluded middle.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The analysis
The claim is a well-established fact in mathematical logic and philosophy: non-classical logics (such as intuitionistic logic and quantum logic) deliberately drop or reject the law of the excluded middle. Papers [2], [5], [8], and [11] provide direct theoretical support demonstrating that alternative logics exist and operate without this principle.
Evidence for · 4
Discusses modal logics based on weaker logics than classical logic, such as intuitionistic systems.
Get citation
Ono, H. (1977). On Some Intuitionistic Modal Logics. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2977/prims/1195189604
See more details
More for · 3
Explicitly demonstrates that the law of the excluded middle fails in certain quantum and intuitionistic logical frameworks.
Get citation
Caspers, M., Heunen, C., Landsman, N. P., & Spitters, B. (2009). Intuitionistic Quantum Logic of an n-level System. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9308-7
Examines partial logics and systems where fundamental classical principles like bivalence fail.
Get citation
Muskens, R. (1999). On Partial and Paraconsistent Logics. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1022615616
Argues and provides theoretical modeling suggesting that non-standard logics, specifically lacking the law of the excluded middle, can apply to complex systems like the brain.
Get citation
Sen, S. (2026). A Topological Surface Network Model of the Brain Suggests That There Is No Law of Excluded Middle in the Brain’s Logic. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202510.0962.v2
Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8831 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work