trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test uses a specific deck of 64 stimulus cards.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test uses a specific deck of 64 stimulus cards?

Yes. The retrieved literature consistently confirms the existence and use of a 64-card version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST-64) that utilizes a single deck of cards.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers repeatedly discuss the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-card version (WCST-64), explicitly noting that it utilizes a single deck of 64 cards as a shortened alternative to the standard 128-card version. There are no papers contradicting this factual description.

Evidence for · 4
2024
Get citation
Cation, B. & Schoenberg, M. (2024). B - 135 Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-Card Computer Version (WCST-64-CV) Failure to Maintain Set (FMS) as an Embedded Performance Validity Indicator in a Mixed Clinical Sample. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.296

See more details
More for · 3
2003
Get citation
Merrick, E. E., Donders, J., & Wiersum, M. (2003). Validity of the WCST-64 after traumatic brain injury.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.2.153.16512

2003
Get citation
Sherer, M., Nick, T. G., Millis, S. R., & Novack, T. A. (2003). Use of the WCST and the WCST-64 in the assessment of traumatic brain injury.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.25.4.512.13877

2004
Get citation
Donders, J. & Wildeboer, M. A. (2004). Validity of the WCST-64 after traumatic brain injury in children.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1080/11385404049052411

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers repeatedly discuss the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-card version (WCST-64), explicitly noting that it utilizes a single deck of 64 cards as a shortened alternative to the standard 128-card version. There are no papers contradicting this factual description.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7705 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work