trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The verb 'going' has multiple semantic meanings ranging from physical movement to future tense.

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the verb 'going' has multiple semantic meanings ranging from physical movement to future tense?

The statement that the verb 'going' has multiple meanings ranging from physical movement to future tense is a matter of basic linguistic description and everyday definition, requiring no formal citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim is trivially true by definition and everyday observation in English grammar and lexicography, fitting the criteria for common knowledge. None of the retrieved papers specifically target or test this standard lexical fact about the word 'going', though the papers generally discuss syntax, tense, and grammaticalization.

What does the evidence say?

The claim is trivially true by definition and everyday observation in English grammar and lexicography, fitting the criteria for common knowledge. None of the retrieved papers specifically target or test this standard lexical fact about the word 'going', though the papers generally discuss syntax, tense, and grammaticalization.

Receipt History
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 006 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work