The use of a tiny subset of possible proteins in life is a result of evolutionary contingency and chemical constraints.
Is it true that the use of a tiny subset of possible proteins in life is a result of evolutionary contingency and chemical constraints?
Yes. Retrieved evolutionary and biochemical literature confirms that the structural and sequence evolution of proteins is heavily restricted by historical contingency, epistasis, and underlying physico-chemical constraints.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The claim posits that protein usage in life is restricted by evolutionary contingency and chemical constraints. Papers [0], [1], and [10] provide direct evidence that physico-chemical properties, thermodynamic constraints, epistasis, and path-dependent historical contingency heavily dictate protein sequence spaces and evolutionary outcomes. No papers refute this premise.
Get citation
Bershtein, S., Serohijos, A. W. R., & Shakhnovich, E. (2016). Bridging the physical scales in evolutionary biology: From protein sequence space to fitness of organisms and populations. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2016.10.013
See more details
Get citation
R, S., CP, K., B, C., M, D. D., A, K., M, L., E, L., S, S., E, S., & D, W. (2024). Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010
Get citation
Taverner, A. M., Blaine, L. J., & Andolfatto, P. (2020). Epistasis and physico-chemical constraints contribute to spatial clustering of amino acid substitutions in protein evolution. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.05.237594
Receipt History
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work