trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The unit cell of graphene contains two carbon atoms

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that the unit cell of graphene contains two carbon atoms?

The unit cell of graphene contains two carbon atoms, which corresponds to its two-sublattice honeycomb crystal structure. This is a foundational crystallographic fact requiring no specific citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states a fundamental, textbook fact about the crystal structure of graphene (a honeycomb lattice with a two-atom basis, namely sublattice A and sublattice B). This is common knowledge in solid-state physics and materials science. None of the retrieved papers specifically test or dispute this definition, making citation unnecessary according to the instructions.

What does the evidence say?

The claim states a fundamental, textbook fact about the crystal structure of graphene (a honeycomb lattice with a two-atom basis, namely sublattice A and sublattice B). This is common knowledge in solid-state physics and materials science. None of the retrieved papers specifically test or dispute this definition, making citation unnecessary according to the instructions.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work